Tuesday, 19 November 2013
From Here We Derive
Possible image for promotional materials for the open work in December? Other possibilities will be added shortly.
Thursday, 14 November 2013
Notes: Pinning down field of research
·
Arts relation to education
·
Importance of skill exchange, peers matching and
reference service to educators at large
·
Internet/virtual forums as a way of connecting
artists across geographical and cultural boundaries
·
Collective intelligence
·
Networking decision making
·
Distributed collaborations
·
Cultural apartheids
·
Collapsing disciplinary divides
·
Focus in the understanding of individual socializing
experience
·
Bourdieu’s term ‘cultural production’
·
Distinction between artist and teacher
·
Learning to learn
·
Pedagogy not concerned with succeeding but with
trying
·
How could assessments keep up with the
revolutions in practise?
·
Why are you an artist?
·
Why did you need education?
·
Why are continuing?
·
Why do you rally against the system?
·
Help towards independence rather than independence
being thrust our throat
·
There was an over powering sense of a vacuum in
the college (bubble concept)
·
Completion
and jealousy is breed
·
What you do with what you know
·
A person who asks themselves questions better
not try asking others
·
To what extent has our political changes
influenced our art schools
·
Recognise the social aspect of leaning and
conversation, interaction with others and application of knowledge’s and integrated
aspects of learning
·
Gallery as educational spaces: Room 13 art space
·
Using the very authority vested in institutions
such as schools in order to work against the grain of such authorities
·
One artist is not enough: many-sided organism
that has the capacity to evolve
·
Society is pre-choiced: our culture gives the illusion
of choice
·
Talent – creative – attitudes
·
School community
·
Pilot programs
·
Learned therefore deserved
Tuesday, 12 November 2013
BACK ONLINE!
Education!
Myself and education have never really seen eye to eye. Anyone
who knows me well enough knows that much of what I know is self-taught. Admirable.
Yes that maybe so, but society does not do admirable, your knowledge and
understanding cannot be a result of your own, it much be accounted for by
someone or something of a higher calibre with headed paper and flashy .com website.
I am not enough in that respect. Much of what I know is
refusing to accept that there is only one or two ways to do something and both
happen to be written by the same institution.
If I am so compelled to challenge the art school; why then
do I have BA and MA after my name? maybe it’s because one has to be in the
thick of it to truly understand? For me it’s not the public as a medium, it’s
the art school as a medium, with the students at its core.
I was asked a question today: Is it the community of the art
school that has compelled you to practise in a socially engaged way?
I can’t answer that right now, I will just have to add it to
the pile! But what got my interest was ‘school community’. I and some others
are trying to recreate this very thing outside of the system. For many years
this has been the case for many collectives. But the art school community is
unlike any other. The mix of friends, relationships, competition and intellectual
copyright forms a breeding ground for much of the issues I am drawn to.
My mission then, is to reacquaint myself with the art school
life style but from outside the white walls as opposed to within.
Friday, 26 July 2013
Written Conversation
The written dialog we displayed at NewRED during CoExist is fascinating
me.
I would like to come up with a few ideas that focuses on our
ability to communicate with one and other while you are away in Austria and I
am here.
‘Communication’ has been a running theme in our collaboration
projects and this gives us the opportunity to investigate this approach but one
that focuses on us as a unity?
We could in corporate this idea with the dyslexia piece you
had posted a few months ago maybe?
Friday, 14 June 2013
PhD: Research List.
Historical context of socially engaged practise:
- Allan Kaprow: Blurring of art and life, Happenings
- Greenburg
- 60's Europe: Arte Povera
- Art market: Pop Art
- Claire Bishop: Artifical Hells
- Pablo Helguera: Education Book
90's:
- Relational Aesthetics
- Bourriard
- YBA
- Celebrity Artists:
Socially engaged practise:
- Arts relationship to activism
- Arts ability to drive social change
Current:
- Artist led spaces
- collectives
- Arts funding
- Michel Gove: Bob and Roberta Smith
- Alternative Arts Schools: Nato Thompson: Pedagogy
Thursday, 13 June 2013
PhD Proposal Layout
Context:
- Intorduction 200
- Describe your own work and interests and how you have persuade them so far 300
- Need for the project: gap in the knowledge give evidence 200
- current relevant thinking: Outline theoretical underpinnings of the proposal 300
- summarise existing knowledge relevant to the project 300
Project aim or research question: express your investigation as a question, which is relevant, manageable, sustainable and original 100
Project objectives: list specific, achievable goals to the project, in terms of what it will do or provide; this should relate to what you have said in your context 100
Project Methods: explain exactly what you are proposing to do. Where appropriate identify the types of research methods you are using 1000
The value of the proposed work: state how the project will address the problem outlined in your context section, or contribute to wider research, say who will benefit 1000
Outcome with timeline: list major milestones of the project and give a realistic estimate of how long each will take to achieve, this should relate directly to your methods section and be expressed in months not weeks
PhD: Affect Collective
Initial work:
Performance: Lydia (comfortable)
Elise (uncomfortable)
Sculpture: Lydia (uncomfortable) Aesthetically, material
Elise (comfortable)
Props/objects: Function
Public Spaces: Function, Simple guestures, interaction with public (engagement), changing dynamics of the space, public theatre
New References: Psycho-geography, behavioural studies, situationisim
Long Term Projects: Library Bus/space to imaginan, Frees Market
FABRICATED FUNCTIONAL SPACES VS. INTERVENTION IN PUBLIC SPACES TO QUESTION THEIR FUNCTION
Performance: Lydia (comfortable)
Elise (uncomfortable)
Sculpture: Lydia (uncomfortable) Aesthetically, material
Elise (comfortable)
Props/objects: Function
Public Spaces: Function, Simple guestures, interaction with public (engagement), changing dynamics of the space, public theatre
New References: Psycho-geography, behavioural studies, situationisim
Long Term Projects: Library Bus/space to imaginan, Frees Market
FABRICATED FUNCTIONAL SPACES VS. INTERVENTION IN PUBLIC SPACES TO QUESTION THEIR FUNCTION
Tuesday, 11 June 2013
Performance for Squieze
Proposal for Squieze
Bargehouse, London
July 2013
Conversation
Piece (homage
to Juan Munoz)
Several performers dressed in plain clothes
will position themselves around the Bargehouse building and along the South Bank
at a set time each day whilst Squieze
is open. Between the performers will be red string and tin cans to form a basic
communication devise (like the telephones you’d make as a child). The
performers will listen to the city and communicate with each other as the
performance evolves. There is no set response. The performers could have their
ear to the ground, relay a conversation overheard in the distance or simple
speak what is on their mind. The emphasis is on communication between
performer, public and the city.
Affect
Collective
An outsiders view
I was going through my e-mails and came across Sean's response to reading my reflective journal essay. He makes some interesting points;
For instance, Licence To Spill got me thinking, as it does you when you mention "art's role in politics". But my problem is that I am at a bit of a loss as to what premise I have to assent to in order to concede that it is definitively "art", and to be considered wholly distinct from the sort of political expression a politician might make in the house of commons or a bloke sticking a home-made political sign to his window. Is it the symbolic aspect in the act of spilling oil and feathers in front of the Tate gallery with their BP sponsorship that puts this in the "art" category? Whereas a political commentator sharing her thoughts doesn't use such symbolism, so therefore that person is not making art in their expression. But then again, the very words are symbols that encode an overall meaning of a similar kind, it's a form of expression as legitimate as any other, so then which forms of expression can we identify as "art" and which can we say are "not art"? When David Cameron last gave a speech was that art? Is he an artist? If not, why not? Is it because he didn't give the speech a title or submit it to a gallery? Is it because it's an expected part of his job? Is it because it's not something you'd want to listen to for it's artistic merit? Why was Licence to Spill firmly in the "art" camp when other similar political acts aren't considered to be? Is it because these other acts were not intended as works of art? Does the intention of the perpetrator define their "art-hood"? Am I an artist without knowing it? Is someone out there writing an essay about me?
For instance, Licence To Spill got me thinking, as it does you when you mention "art's role in politics". But my problem is that I am at a bit of a loss as to what premise I have to assent to in order to concede that it is definitively "art", and to be considered wholly distinct from the sort of political expression a politician might make in the house of commons or a bloke sticking a home-made political sign to his window. Is it the symbolic aspect in the act of spilling oil and feathers in front of the Tate gallery with their BP sponsorship that puts this in the "art" category? Whereas a political commentator sharing her thoughts doesn't use such symbolism, so therefore that person is not making art in their expression. But then again, the very words are symbols that encode an overall meaning of a similar kind, it's a form of expression as legitimate as any other, so then which forms of expression can we identify as "art" and which can we say are "not art"? When David Cameron last gave a speech was that art? Is he an artist? If not, why not? Is it because he didn't give the speech a title or submit it to a gallery? Is it because it's an expected part of his job? Is it because it's not something you'd want to listen to for it's artistic merit? Why was Licence to Spill firmly in the "art" camp when other similar political acts aren't considered to be? Is it because these other acts were not intended as works of art? Does the intention of the perpetrator define their "art-hood"? Am I an artist without knowing it? Is someone out there writing an essay about me?
Friday, 7 June 2013
Research Questions 2#
First question was: How can a socially engaged practice operate in an art school?
The question is negative; assuming that such a practise cannot operate in an art school which is of course not true, but the very idea of a student conducting such a practise and the issues associated, is of interest.
With lots of deliberation I do now feel my interests were about the institution and how certain specification contradicted art practise.
Second question: To what affect can a specifically designed space influence participants in a socially engaged art work?
I have a problem with using the term "socially engaged"
The question is not working hard enough for me and the ideas I have. So what I thought I would do bullet points of my ideas and we could come up with something better?
The question is negative; assuming that such a practise cannot operate in an art school which is of course not true, but the very idea of a student conducting such a practise and the issues associated, is of interest.
With lots of deliberation I do now feel my interests were about the institution and how certain specification contradicted art practise.
Second question: To what affect can a specifically designed space influence participants in a socially engaged art work?
I have a problem with using the term "socially engaged"
The question is not working hard enough for me and the ideas I have. So what I thought I would do bullet points of my ideas and we could come up with something better?
- The sorts of spaces I am interested in is spaces for action and exchange
- Project spaces
- Hans Ulrich Obrist (curator): "The instructions is the work not the object...Instructions can be interpreted in different ways like recipes"
- How we design the space around the activity idea could comply with a set of rules?
- "RULES OF THE GAME"
- curating is a massive part of my interests and how the space/work manipulates the viewer.
- Work spaces are also of interest
- the value in collective knowledge and how to nurture that.
- the possibility of producing different formats for public space. The currency exchanged in such situations may be cultural even political, the currency of social interaction is indeed as generic as it gets.
- How does such work connect to a person? I want people to not look at it but be in it!
- Aesthetics of space are important.
Claire Fontaine - Fictional Artist
http://www.clairefontaine.ws/index.html
http://www.clairefontaine.ws/pdf/jk_interview_eng.pdf
Look at this interview, it really relates to our super artist idea :)
http://www.clairefontaine.ws/pdf/jk_interview_eng.pdf
Look at this interview, it really relates to our super artist idea :)
Sunday, 12 May 2013
Thursday, 25 April 2013
RJ Feedback part 1.
After reading your RJ, it’s clear that you have identified habits
you have employed over the years which can sometimes be detrimental to your overall
intentions. One that is a constant theme in your work is the battle between action
and symbolism. Which as you noted is clearly outlined in the Pablo book. My thoughts on this aspect
is that this struggle to overcome work that acts as statement while trying to
be true to the action/situation that it derived from becomes a trap that I think
anyone who works with this type of subject can easily fall into. It is also an
issue that I have come up against while writing my PhD proposal on how to
conduct a very public orientated practise within an institution.
I feel that you are continuing this trait with your final
degree show work; this maybe because of the shows set-up (white cube) or that
you are now on the edge of a cliff and your instinct is to move back as appose
to jump. This metaphor is about the ‘risk’.
You have also identified the field of object making that by
your own admition, you have little experience with. This is not a derogatory statement
but one that allows me to emphasise that sometimes inexperience can allow you
to explore static objects and making with a clear mind, which is starting to
show in your current making.
One of the least important but one that will be of use in
the future is this idea of categorisation. Firstly you are an artist, your work
can span across all ‘isims’ and types; the context you employ has no bearing on
what artist you are at all, just how the work will function.
Control is another element you seem to crisis
yourself for. Which I think you are right to. When you work with public and on
very public subject matters it is best to create a space within the work where
you can let it be. As you have experienced with the Trace performance, the public will intervene and that is something
you had not factored in. the public is the most organic material an artist can
work with and to understand that trying to control any given public situation
will be counter-productive.
Wednesday, 24 April 2013
BA Degree Show: Lydia
Link below might be of use to you.
http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/creativeinstinct/rural-artists-with-a-wide-orbit/4232856
Food for thought:
http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/creativeinstinct/rural-artists-with-a-wide-orbit/4232856
Food for thought:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










